Within the FG flood interval, we find many well-developed soils. Many show well developed root systems. Others show well developed caliche zones that tell us the climate was semiarid and stable for a period of time.

Columns from many YEC authors with radically different interpretations of the flood interval. If this truly was a single global catastrophe, why can’t the believers agree on where it is? I showed that their models tell us the rates of deposition that they demand and thus demand radically catastrophic processes, that are not observed.

Stromatolites are deposits, usually from tides that repeatedly covered and uncovered algal mats that trapped sediment. Some showed classic birdseye structures that result from exposure and drying of the mats for some periods of times. Stromatolites are found in essentially every age of rock that is interpreted as flood deposits.

Many intervals called in FG to be flood deposits include large, thick reef deposits which could not have grown during the 1-year flood. Thick reefs in the post-flood interval, including modern reefs took much longer to grown than are feasible in FG timeline.

I show how rocks show consistent changes in the fossils found, such that recent life is never represented in the older rocks and almost all of the oldest forms disappeared from the later rocks. The consistency of the record on all of the continents shows that this was not the result of migration of forms or hydrodynamic differences in species.

Large numbers of measurements have been made from around the world consistently point to the dated rocks being much older than the YEC time frame allows. These are not flukes. They are the rule not the exception. – No easy errors are found in either the theory or methodology exist that invalidate this methodology. Large well-funded efforts have tried.