One aspect of the fine-tuning the universe is that there are 6 fundamental constants recognized that must be set with high precision in order for a universe to exist that could possibly host planets that could potentially have life on them.  This fine-tuning is widely recognized by both non-Christian and Christian astronomers and cosmologists alike.  For example, the English astronomer, Lord Martin Rees wrote about this in his book: “Just Six Numbers” in 2000.  The University of Cambridge Institute of Astronomy described him this way: Lord Martin Rees (born in England in 1942) is one of the most distinguished theoretical physicists of our time, with seminal contributions in a large number of areas, from cosmology and the formation of the first stars and galaxies to high-energy astrophysics, to the formation and evolution of massive black holes in the centers of galaxies, tidal disruption of stars in the vicinity of such black holes, and more. These contributions shaped our deepest understanding of the Universe.”  Rees is not a Christian, but in his book, he recognized that this coincidence could be interpreted to point to a beneficent creator.  He seemed to think that a multiverse would provide a possible explanation.

Of course, these six constants are just a small part of the characteristics that seem to be fine-tuned to allow intelligent life to exist.  The article cited here just came out and provides what I find to be a very interesting development in this field.  Scientists from Princeton University developed a way to allow artificial intelligence (AI) to help refine our measurements of the constants.  They programed in data for 2000 hypothetical universes using different values of the constants.  They used them to train the AI and then allowed the AI to study the actual universe.  One might have thought that they would learn that somehow the constants were related and might be easier explained.  In fact, they were able to refine the actual constants beyond that known before.

The study was able to recognize relationships that would be perhaps impossible to recognize by humans using our individual limited minds. What I find most interesting is that using an intelligence that in this type of exercise is beyond humans makes the universe more understandable.  Is this not another clue that an intelligence far beyond humans is responsible for the universe?  The universe at the large scales is both highly complex and yet highly organized.  It seems even less conceivable that it appeared by random coincidence.  If you examine randomly generated products closely enough, they look random. The beneficent creator that Rees mentioned is a simpler explanation with a very robust ability to explain all of the characteristics of the universe.  Such a creator would be implied by the apparent selection of the values of these independent constants.  A creator who makes selections is a personal being.

This definitely does not prove that this creator was the God of the Bible.  It does make this possibility well worth investigating.